News

CALL FOR PAPERS JANUARY 2026

IJSAR going to launch new issue Volume 07, Issue 01, January 2026; Open Access; Peer Reviewed Journal; Fast Publication. Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions or comments send email to: editor@scienceijsar.com

IMPACT FACTOR: 6.673

Submission last date: 20th January 2026

Learning by Doing (LBD): A framework for experiential learning in 21st-century education

×

Error message

  • Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type int in element_children() (line 6609 of /home1/sciensrd/public_html/scienceijsar.com/includes/common.inc).
  • Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type int in element_children() (line 6609 of /home1/sciensrd/public_html/scienceijsar.com/includes/common.inc).
  • Deprecated function: implode(): Passing glue string after array is deprecated. Swap the parameters in drupal_get_feeds() (line 394 of /home1/sciensrd/public_html/scienceijsar.com/includes/common.inc).
Author: 
Trevor Rickford Lincoln Jones
Page No: 
10709-10719

The Learning by Doing (LbD) framework is a mechanism that redefines experiential learning to inculcate critical 21st-century skills such as critical thinking and collaboration. Grounded in constructivist theory and Dewey's principles of experiential education. This study investigates the effectiveness of the LbD framework in enhancing the development of 21st-century skills among students, with a particular focus on engagement, critical thinking, content retention, and academic performance. This study useda mixed-methods approach, involving 100 participants across varied educational settings, interspersing surveys, test data, and statistical analyses, to assess the impact of LbD on student outcomes. Quantitative data were analyzed using ANOVA, paired t-tests, one-way and two-way ANOVA, and non-parametric tests such as the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. Results indicate substantial enhancements in engagement, knowledge retention, and skill acquisition over traditional teaching methods, supported by ANOVA and interconnection t-test analyses that left substantial effect sizes. Results revealed significant improvements in student outcomes, with a large effect size observed in post-test scores compared to pre-test scores (t = 9.7, p < .001, d = 1.37), and strong correlations between LbD implementation and increased engagement (M = 4.42), critical thinking (M = 4.32), and content retention (M = 4.28). Qualitative feedback supported these findings, highlighting increased motivation, self-direction, and collaborative learning. While it has advantages, challenges like resource constraints, teacher preparedness, and alignment with standardized assessment exist. Qualitative data suggest that LbD may have motivational and cognitive benefits that support deeper learning. The researcher explored implications for curriculum design, professional development, and recommendations for policies that support scalable implementation. Futurestudies could address longitudinal/dynamic effects, adaptive learning technologies, and interdisciplinary applications in this regard, establishing LbD as a pivotal approach for developing key competencies that are truly helpful for students in the real world.

Download PDF: