British and Beninese judicial systems facing the complex demands of modernity and globalisation for sustainable development

British and Beninese judicial norms, institutions, authorities, agents and procedures are set into a system that shows a guarantee and a success of making justice for all. Nevertheless, connecting certain of these intentions, will and statements to judicial practices remains complex and challenging, because sometimes corruption, some breach of procedures, some cases of exceptions and juriprudence, make judicial written elements difficult to apply. The philosophy or the spirit of law and the justice making process, are then betrayed in practices in both British and Beninese political systems. That is the reason why, the purpose of this analysis is to use New Historicist Criticism to move from the socio-historical, political and economic contexts of both countries so as to examine the challenging forces of justice making systems of these nations as well as improvements and other alternatives to different hindrances for a judicial organisation favorable to sustainable development.