News

CALL FOR PAPERS MAY 2026

IJSAR going to launch new issue Volume 07, Issue 05, May 2026; Open Access; Peer Reviewed Journal; Fast Publication. Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions or comments send email to: editor@scienceijsar.com

IMPACT FACTOR: 6.673

Submission last date: 20th May 2026

Teachers’ perspectives on spiral progression in mathematics 7: A qualitative analysis using the adapted kirkpatrick model

×

Error message

  • Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type int in element_children() (line 6609 of /home1/sciensrd/public_html/scienceijsar.com/includes/common.inc).
  • Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type int in element_children() (line 6609 of /home1/sciensrd/public_html/scienceijsar.com/includes/common.inc).
  • Deprecated function: implode(): Passing glue string after array is deprecated. Swap the parameters in drupal_get_feeds() (line 394 of /home1/sciensrd/public_html/scienceijsar.com/includes/common.inc).
Author: 
Jemverlyn G. Asilo and Fe R. Janiola
Page No: 
784-787

This study evaluated the implementation of the spiral progression approach in Mathematics 7 from teachers’ perspectives using the Adapted Kirkpatrick Evaluation Model as an analytical framework. Conducted in selected public secondary schools in the LOCATU (Loon–Calape–Tubigon) Sub-Congressional District 1, Schools Division Office of Bohol, the study employed a descriptive-qualitative research design. Twelve (12) Mathematics 7 teachers were purposively selected based on school size classification and experience in implementing the spiral progression approach. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using thematic analysis following Braun and Clarke (2006). The Kirkpatrick Model was adapted to the educational context by aligning its four levels with teachers’ perspectives: Reaction (teachers’ responses), Learning (teachers’ observations of students’ understanding and engagement), Behavior (instructional practices and pedagogical adjustments), and Results (perceived outcomes of implementation). Findings revealed that teachers perceived the spiral progression approach as structurally complex and fragmented, resulting in discontinuity of lessons and misalignment with learners’ readiness. Teachers reported weak retention, limited conceptual mastery, and difficulty in connecting mathematical concepts across topics. They employed adaptive instructional strategies such as scaffolding, differentiated instruction, collaborative learning, and curriculum modification, indicating increased instructional burden and systemic gaps. Furthermore, the spiral progression approach contributed to limited student preparedness for advanced mathematical concepts, weak long-term retention, and persistent foundational learning gaps. Its effectiveness was constrained by issues in sequencing, pacing, and instructional alignment. The study recommends curriculum refinement, strengthened instructional support, and improved coherence in content sequencing under the MATATAG Curriculum.

Download PDF: