The determination of international criminal responsibility towards international crimes has become, without a doubt, a necessity for achieving international criminal justice in order to achieve peace and reconciliation between peoples torn apart by factors of conflict and conflict, and thus it has become certain that relying on justice and its expectations in deterring criminals in the future must be so. Reaching justice for the victims and collective peace in that society can be achieved through international claims as one of the aspects that help restore and preserve peace. So, the International Criminal Court (ICC) is now able to perform its judicial work independently and with integrity and impartiality thanks to the fact that its Prosecutor and judges are elected rather than appointed, as was the case with the provisional international criminal courts in the past. This is reflected in the reasons and causes of the criminal court ruling in the fact that this judicial system, whether on the national or international level, is politically independent towards all persons, as well as being committed to the causes of criminal justice towards both the accused and the victim through the effectiveness and transparency of the procedures taken by the judicial bodies. In order to achieve deterrence factors for those who begged him in the future. Thus, the indications of the independence of the PICC in its judicial work are clear through what was stated in the texts of the Rome Statute for it, which were mentioned previously in the search for any political influences from the states parties to this Statute or from other international entities, thus achieving the principle of universality. Punishment and its independence requires that the International Criminal Court be removed from any political pressures or obstacles that may face its work, as well as the legislative response required to achieve international criminal justice by the state parties in an impartial and impartial manner.