News

CALL FOR PAPERS JULY 2024

IJSAR going to launch new issue Volume 05, Issue 07, July 2024; Open Access; Peer Reviewed Journal; Fast Publication. Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions or comments send email to: editor@scienceijsar.com

IMPACT FACTOR: 6.673

Submission last date: 15th July 2024

Comparative study of the three frequent encountered numerical methods of integration with emphasis on their error terms

×

Error message

  • Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type int in element_children() (line 6609 of /home1/sciensrd/public_html/scienceijsar.com/includes/common.inc).
  • Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type int in element_children() (line 6609 of /home1/sciensrd/public_html/scienceijsar.com/includes/common.inc).
  • Deprecated function: implode(): Passing glue string after array is deprecated. Swap the parameters in drupal_get_feeds() (line 394 of /home1/sciensrd/public_html/scienceijsar.com/includes/common.inc).
Author: 
Njipouakouyou Samuel and Mahamat Saleh Daoussa Haggar
Page No: 
2050-2059

Very few functions can be integrated analytically. For the large class of those ones whose integral cannot be found such a way, only numerical methods are helpful. They are many and all of them generate errors. The goal of this paper is to find out those ones which minimize these errors. The most encountered numerical methods the Newton-Cotes, Tchebyshev and Gauss. This study indicates that the method of Gauss gives better results, follows by the method of Tchebyshev. The method of Newton-Cotes is at the third position. Moreover, for more accurate results the integrating function should be replace by an algebraic function of order not exceeding 2.

Download PDF: